Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: ACP fire safety, Aluminium composite panels, apartment owners' rights, avoiding litigation, BAB landmark case, BAB model, building appeals board, Building code compliance, Building Code of Australia, Building regulation Australia, Building safety governance, cladding compliance case, cladding legal case, Cladding legal precedents, cladding remediation costs, cladding risk mitigation, combustible ACP ruling, compliance verification, construction law australia, Cost-effective compliance, CP2 and CP4 standards, CSIRO cladding analysis, dispute resolution effectiveness., dispute resolution models, expert legal representation, fire rescue regulation, fire safety compliance, Fire safety testing, international best practice, Lovegrove & Cotton, Melbourne cladding safety, Multi-disciplinary dispute resolution, Municipal Building Surveyor, owners corporation dispute, Owners Corporation success, performance-based approach, performance-based compliance, regulatory oversight, Strata legal disputes, Victorian BAB ruling, victorian building act, victorian building authority